class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide .title[ # Method: Toolkits for the Interpretivist Approach ] .subtitle[ ## Public Policy Analysis: Perspectives and Methods (30700953) ] .author[ ### Yue HU ] --- ## Overview + Process tracing + Interview + Focus group + Content analysis --- background-image: url("images/process_crimeBoard.webp") background-position: bottom background-size: 90% ## Process Tracing > A research method for tracing causal mechanisms using .red[detailed, within-case] empirical analysis of how a causal mechanism operated in real-world cases. (Beach & Pedersen 2019) ??? Crime board --- ## Operating a Process Tracing Goal : Theory testing Hypothesis: Examining explanation rivalries -- Operation: <img src = "images/process_tracing.png" > --- ## Example: English Recognition in Singapore Theoretical question: - Language recognition Empirical puzzle: - English is an official language of Singapore, but only **21% of the population** spoke this language when the country was independent. .pull-left[.center[<img src = "../teachingDemo/image/singaporeLang2.jpg" height = 200>]] -- .pull-right[ Research Question: - Why did English become an official language of Singapore? ] --- ## Step 1: Identify Hypotheses .pull-left[ H<sub>0</sub>: State (institutional) capacity <img src = "images/process_singapore.jpg"> ] -- .pull-right[ H<sub>1</sub>: Prioritization of the education ministry .center[<img src = "images/process_goh.jpg" height = 400>] ] ??? Goh Keng Swee (吴庆瑞): 财政部长、内政及国防部长、副总理, 奠定了新加坡教育的精英主义政策, 取得伦敦政经学院经济学博士学位。 The Goh Report identified and set out recommendations to address three shortcomings: high education wastage, low literacy, and ineffective bilingualism. English was taught to maximize proficiency --- background-image: url("images/timelineEnglish.jpg") background-position: center background-size: contain ## Step 2: Establish Time Line ??? 1. The very second step right after determining the DV 1. Before the evidence collection --- ## Step 3: Construct Causal Graph .center[<img src="images/causalEnglish.jpg" height = 500 />] ??? Causal process of X → Y Used to identify relevant moments and actors that could affect the results. --- ## Step 4: Identify Alternative Choice or Event ## Step 5: Identify Counterfactual Outcomes Counterfactual 1: Weak State → language of the dominant population language. Counterfactual 2: Leed did not assign Goh as the MOE → the status quo. ??? A reason that choices might make differences If there's no comparative cases, then conterfactual outcomes. --- class: center, middle ## Step 6: Find Evidence for Primary Hypothesis<sup>*</sup> | .small[Necessity\\Sufficiency]| Yes | No | |-----------------------|-----------------|-------------------| | Yes | Double-Decisive | Smoking Gun | | No | Hoop (No alibi) | Straw-in-the-Wind | .footnote[ * Evera, Stephen Van. 1997. *Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science*. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ] ??? 1. Hoop test: no alibi, the accused in the state when murder happens? If not innocent, but passing does not mean being guilty. 1. Smoking-gun test: a smoking gun seen in a suspect's hand moments after a shooting is quite conclusive proof of guilt, but a suspect not seen with a smoking gun is not proven innocent. 1. Double-decisive test: hoop + smoking-gun, like a camera record 1. Straw-in-the-wind test: Richard Liu seemed friendly with the girl. --- ## What Type of Evidence This IS? <iframe width="700" height="500" src="//player.bilibili.com/player.html?aid=340625924&bvid=BV1z94y1d7Jk&cid=576028946&page=1&t=1475" scrolling="no" border="0" frameborder="no" framespacing="0" allowfullscreen="true"> </iframe> ??? 对谁提供了什么证据 白手套,蝙蝠侠父亲是罪犯, smoking-gun --- --- ## What Type of Evidence This IS? <iframe width="700" height="500" src="//player.bilibili.com/player.html?aid=340961043&bvid=BV14R4y1K7Kq&cid=581750449&page=1&t=273" scrolling="no" border="0" frameborder="no" framespacing="0" allowfullscreen="true"> </iframe> ??? Hoop --- --- ## What Type of Evidence This IS? <iframe width="700" height="500" src="//player.bilibili.com/player.html?aid=884604227&bvid=BV1bK4y1a7pn&cid=235177797&page=1&t=273" scrolling="no" border="0" frameborder="no" framespacing="0" allowfullscreen="true"> </iframe> ??? Straw in the wind, 知乎有贴说女子与L某一路挽着回屋,中间没有强迫行为 <img src = "images/process_liuqiangdong.jfif" height = 400> --- background-image: url("images/process_evidenceEnglish.png") background-position: center background-size: contain ??? The primary hypothesis failed the hoop test: when recognition happened, the state was not a strong state --- background-image: url("images/process_map.png") background-position: center background-size: contain --- ## Interview .center[<img src="images/interview.jpg" height = 300 />] .center[.normal[A .red[strategic] communication (guiding and listening)]] --- ### How a Interview Processes <video width="700" height="500" controls> <source src="https://link.jscdn.cn/1drv/aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL3YvcyFBcnR0dk83MHdLSU8xSEdDS2ItLV9xMk5CYndpP2U9aEg3V011.mp4" type="video/mp4"> </video> ??? Brexit: The Uncivil War Benedict Cumberbatch as Dominic Cummings, main political strategist for Vote Leave, --- .pull-left[ ### Outcomes: + Open answers + Messy details + Contradictory points ] -- .pull-right[ ### Set-up + Safe environment + More listening, less talking + Design the interview strategy + pilots ] -- .center[ ### Be Prepared... <img src="images/dontLike.gif" height = 200 /> ] --- ## Focus Group Procedure: 1. Size: 5--15 interviewees 1. Subjects read or watch something. 1. Researcher ask the questions. 1. Subjects express the feelings and opinions. -- .pull-left[ ### Pros: 1. Real-life environment 1. Flexibility 1. Low cost ] -- .pull-right[ ### Cons: 1. Non-privacy-protection 1. Who lead the talk? 1. No SUTVA 1. Selection interviewees ] --- ## How Focus Group Works <video width="700" height="500" controls> <source src="https://link.jscdn.cn/1drv/aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL3YvcyFBcnR0dk83MHdLSU8xSEpWNnJNTlYtTEtmMXFjP2U9aDZFWWRJ.mp4" type="video/mp4"> </video> ??? Brexit: The Uncivil War Rory Kinnear as Craig Oliver, the former Director of Politics and Communications for British prime minister David Cameron --- ## Content/Discourse Analysis .center[<img src="images/closeReading.jpg" height = 480 />] --- ## Step 1: Content Sampling * Terminology: + Content analysis: 100 and below + Text analysis: above 100 (usually above 1,000) + Unit of analysis? -- * Sampling technique + Convenient sample + Stratification + Clustering -- ## Step 2: Coding * Manifest content * Latent content * Online assistance: [CATMA](http://catma.de/) or eMargin --- ## Example with CATMA .center[<img src="images/tag.png" height = 500 />] --- .pull-left[<img src="images/topictrend.png" height = 500 />] .pull-right[ ## Step 3 Analysis Not much different from other interpretive methods 1. Context 1. Transparency 1. Transferability .pull-left[ ### Pros * Economic * Allowing correction * Overtime survey * Third party ] .pull-right[ ### Cons * Limited content * Limited scale * Subjective consistency ] ] --- background-image: url("images/process_mindmap.png") background-position: center background-size: contain ## Take-Home Points --- background-image: url("images/cha_challenge.gif") background-position: center background-size: contain